JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradway, D.
Right arrow Articles by McElwain, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradway, D.
Right arrow Articles by McElwain, T.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 13, Issue 1, 79-81
Copyright © 2001 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Clinical Trial

Sensitivity and specificity of the complement fixation test for detection of cattle persistently infected with Anaplasma marginale

DS Bradway, S Torioni de Echaide, DP Knowles, SG Hennager, and TF McElwain

Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Pullman 99164, USA.

The complement fixation (CF) test commonly is used to identify cattle infected with Anaplasma marginale prior to interstate or international movement. Estimates of the accuracy of the CF test in detecting animals persistently infected with A. marginale vary widely. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of the CF test for detection of carrier animals was determined using serum from 232 cattle previously defined as A. marginale positive or negative by nested polymerase chain reaction methods and hybridization. Considering results from 2 independent laboratories and interpreting a 1:5 suspect reaction as positive, the best estimate of CF test sensitivity was 20%, with a specificity of 98%. Using a 1:10 cutoff, sensitivity decreased to 14% and specificity increased to 99%. Results of this study indicate that the CF test is ineffective for identifying cattle persistently infected with A. marginale and thus is inadequate for anaplasmosis regulatory and surveillance programs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
K. M. Kocan, J. de la Fuente, A. A. Guglielmone, and R. D. Melendez
Antigens and Alternatives for Control of Anaplasma marginale Infection in Cattle
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2003; 16(4): 698 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.