JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tapp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tapp, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, V.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 13, Issue 3, 219-229
Copyright © 2001 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Evaluation Studies

Differential detection of Bartonella species and strains in cat scratch disease diagnostics by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 16S ribosomal RNA gene

RA Tapp, AF Roy, RE Corstvet, and VL Wilson

Institute of Environmental Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA.

Cat scratch disease (CSD) has been difficult to diagnose in animals because of the protracted clinical course of infection and the quiescent phases when the microbial culprit lies dormant. The causative agent in CSD appears to be multiple species and strains of Bartonella. Using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques for amplification of highly variable regions of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequence, a very sensitive species- and strain-specific assay for CSD-causing Bartonella species was developed. PCR primers were designed to specifically amplify the 16S rRNA gene of Bartonella species but not of other microbial pathogens. This initial PCR was multiplexed with a universal primer set, based on conserved sequence regions in the 16S rRNA gene, that provides a 162-bp fragment in all species tested. Subsequently, 3 distinct nested PCR primer sets enabled the individual amplification and specific detection of Bartonella henselae type 1, B. henselae type II, and B. clarridgeae. Thus, this 2-step PCR procedure enabled the sensitive detection and identification of these species and the B. henselae genotype by exploiting minor sequences differences. Verification of these results were demonstrated with both sequencing and ligase chain reaction techniques. The diagnostic usefulness of this CSD test has been demonstrated by the analysis of specimens from control and infected cats. The diagnosis was confirmed and the specific B. henselae strain was correctly identified in peripheral blood specimens obtained from control and strain-specific CSD-infected cats. Such an accurate and sensitive diagnostic tool for the detection and identification of CSD causative agents should be a useful for the medical, veterinary, and scientific communities.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.