JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vimont, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pointon, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vimont, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pointon, A.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 17, Issue 5, 430-435
Copyright © 2005 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

The adequacy of sample type/weight and incubation period on detection of Salmonella spp. in slaughter cattle

AJ Vimont, A Kiermeier, DJ Padula, GL Holds, and AM Pointon

Ecole Nationale Veterinaire de Lyon, France.

The purpose of this study was to examine the adequacy of different sample types (fecal and rumen content), rumen-content sample weight (1, 10, and 25 g), and incubation period on the detection of Salmonella spp. in grass-fed beef cattle at slaughter. The culture technique was the same for all samples and followed the Australian Standard (AS 1766.2.5-1991). Sample adequacy was defined as the ratio between the overall prevalence, as obtained from samples identified as positive by any sample type/weight, and the estimated prevalence, as obtained from samples identified as positive by a particular sample type/weight. Sample adequacy reflects the likelihood of a sample of a particular type and weight to contain the organism of interest and hence is related to the sensitivity of the diagnostic test. It was found that sample adequacy differed between sample types and weights: 37.5% for both a 10-g fecal sample and a 1-g rumen sample, 77.1% for a 10-g rumen sample, and 79.2% for a 25-g rumen sample. On this basis, it is strongly recommended that sample type and weight be considered in the design of studies that aim to quantify Salmonella contamination in cattle.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.