JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robbe-Austerman, S
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robbe-Austerman, S
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, M.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 18, Issue 2, 189-194
Copyright © 2006 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Evaluation Studies

Evaluation of the gamma interferon ELISA in sheep subclinically infected with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis using a whole-cell sonicate or a johnin purified-protein derivative

S Robbe-Austerman, Stabel JR, and MV Palmer

Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, USA. sausterm@nadc.ars.usda.gov

The aim of the study reported here was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) ELISA for paratuberculosis in sheep using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Bacteriologic culture of tissues was used to define the reference positive population (n = 33). Two reference negative populations were used: culture-negative sheep from infected flocks (n = 77), and sheep from noninfected flocks (n = 358). We also evaluated the accuracy of 2 Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) antigen preparations, a whole-cell sonicate (MpS) and a johnin purified-protein derivative (PPDj). The source of the reference negative sheep used in the analysis affected overall accuracy of the IFN-gamma ELISA. The area under the curve was 0.683 (95% confidence interval 0.574-0.787), using culture-negative sheep from infected flocks, was 0.831 (0.764-0.889), using sheep from noninfected flocks for the MpS, and was 0.809 (0.726-0.881) and 0.897 (0.862-0.925) for the PPDj, respectively. Using the MpS, the cut point that classified the most sheep correctly was an optical density reading of 0.20, for sensitivity of 40.7% (19.4-57.6) and specificity of 88.7% (77.0-95.7) or 97.6% (93.04-99.5), depending on the reference negative population used. Using the PPDj, the cut point that classified the most sheep correctly was 0.25 for sensitivity of 66.7% (47.2-82.7) and specificity of 93.5% (85.5-97.9) or 98.3% (96.4-99.4), respectively. The PPDj was more accurate at identifying MAP-infected sheep than was the MpS (P = 0.034).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvdiHome page
D. J. Begg, K. de Silva, K. Bosward, L. Di Fiore, D. L. Taylor, G. Jungersen, and R. J. Whittington
Enzyme-linked immunospot: an alternative method for the detection of interferon gamma in Johne's disease
J Vet Diagn Invest, March 1, 2009; 21(2): 187 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. R. Stabel
Pasteurization of Colostrum Reduces the Incidence of Paratuberculosis in Neonatal Dairy Calves
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3600 - 3606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvdiHome page
Suelee. Robbe-Austerman, J. R. Stabel, and D. G. Morrical
Skin test and gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results in sheep exposed to dead Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis organisms
J Vet Diagn Invest, January 1, 2007; 19(1): 88 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
M. Semret, D. Bakker, N. Smart, I. Olsen, K. Haslov, and M. A. Behr
Genetic Analysis of Mycobacterium avium Complex Strains Used for Producing Purified Protein Derivatives
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., September 1, 2006; 13(9): 991 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.