HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rovira, A. Articles by Muñoz-Zanzi, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rovira, A. Articles by Muñoz-Zanzi, C.

Evaluation of surveillance protocols for detecting porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection in boar studs by simulation modeling

Correspondence: ¹Corresponding Author: Albert Rovira, 385 An Sci/Vet Med, 1988 Fitch Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108, e-mail: rove0010{at}umn.edu

Because porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) can be transmitted through semen, PRRSV-free boar studs need to be routinely monitored to rapidly detect any potential PRRSV introduction. However, current protocols for monitoring PRRSV in boar studs are diverse, sometimes very costly, and their effectiveness has not been quantified. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of different monitoring protocols to detect PRRSV introduction into a negative boar stud by using a simulation modeling approach. A stochastic transmission model was constructed to simulate the spread of PRRSV in a typical negative boar stud in the USA (herd size of 200 boars, 60% annual replacement) and the performance of monitoring protocols by using different sample sizes (10, 30, and 60 samples), sampling frequency (3 times a week, weekly, and biweekly), and diagnostic procedures (PCR on semen, PCR on serum, ELISA on serum, and both PCR and ELISA on serum). The monitoring protocols were evaluated in terms of the time from PRRSV introduction into the boar stud to PRRSV detection. Protocols that used PCR on serum detected the PRRSV introduction earlier than protocols that used PCR on semen, and these were earlier than those that used ELISA on serum. The most intensive protocol evaluated (testing 60 boars 3 times a week by PCR on serum) would need 13 days to detect 95% of the PRRSV introductions. These results support field observations, suggesting that an intensive monitoring protocol needs to be in place in a boar stud to quickly detect a PRRSV introduction.

Key Words: Boars • diagnostic • monitoring • porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome • sampling • simulation model

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Madson, S. Ramamoorthy, C. Kuster, N. Pal, X.-J. Meng, P. G. Halbur, and T. Opriessnig Characterization of shedding patterns of Porcine circovirus types 2a and 2b in experimentally inoculated mature boars J Vet Diagn Invest, November 1, 2008; 20(6): 725 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]