JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation Vol. 20 Issue 6, 744-751
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Opriessnig, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Opriessnig, T.

Full Scientific Reports

Comparison of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to detect Porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2)–specific antibodies after vaccination or inoculation of pigs with distinct PCV-1 or PCV-2 isolates

Abby R. Patterson, John Johnson, Sheela Ramamoorthy, Xiang-Jin Meng, Patrick G. Halbur and Tanja Opriessnig1

Correspondence: 1Corresponding Author: Tanja Opriessnig, Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1250. tanjaopr{at}iastate.ed

Porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2) serology is frequently used to determine PCV-2 status and optimal timing of PCV-2 vaccination in the field. The objectives of the current study are to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 3 currently available commercial anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG) PCV-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and to compare the ability of the 3 assays to detect and differentiate between anti–PCV-2a and anti–PCV-2b antibodies, as well as anti–PCV-2 and anti–PCV-1 antibodies. Fifty-five 3-week-old, conventional pigs were randomly allocated to 7 groups: 1) negative controls (n = 7), 2) PCV-2a (n = 8; inoculated with PCV-2 ISU-40895), 3) PCV-2b (n = 8; inoculated with PCV-2 NC-16845), 4) PCV-1 (n = 8), 5) vaccine A (n = 8; Ingelvac® CircoFLEXTM), 6) vaccine B (n = 8; Circumvent® PCV2), and 7) vaccine C (n = 8; Suvaxyn® PCV2 One Dose). Blood samples were collected weekly, and all sera were tested by 3 different anti–PCV-2 IgG ELISAs. The results indicated that all ELISAs had area under the receiver operating curve values greater than 0.94, detected both anti–PCV-2a and -2b antibodies with no differentiation, and did not detect anti–PCV-1 antibodies in infected animals. One of the ELISAs was able to distinguish pigs vaccinated with vaccine B from pigs inoculated with either PCV-2a or PCV-2b.

Key Words: Antibodies • enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay • Porcine circovirus-2 • serology • vaccination







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.