JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation Vol. 21 Issue 6, 830-836
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carra, E.
Right arrow Articles by Capucci, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carra, E.
Right arrow Articles by Capucci, L.

Brief Research Reports

Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic tests used in bovine spongiform encephalopathy monitoring in Italy

Elena Carra1, Roberta Taddei, Ilaria Barbieri, Giuliana Botti, Vito Tranquillo, Alessandra Iori, Lucia Gibelli, Monica Cerioli, Patrizia Cavadini, Daniela Gelmetti, Stefano Pongolini and Lorenzo Capucci

Correspondence: 1Corresponding Author: Elena Carra, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna-Sezione Diagnostica di Modena, Via E. Diena-16, 41100 Modena, Italy. elena.carra{at}izsler.it

In 2001, a compulsory active surveillance system was started in the European Union to assess the prevalence of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in the cattle population. The aim of the current study was to report on the field performances of 3 rapid tests: a Western blot (WB), a chemiluminescence enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and an immunochromatographic assay, routinely used at 3 laboratories of the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Lombardia and Emilia Romagna, over 8 years of BSE monitoring activity. A total of 2,802,866 samples from slaughtered animals and 202,453 samples from fallen stock were tested by 1 of 3 tests. Positive results of the rapid tests were confirmed by histopathological examination, immunohistochemistry, and confirmatory WB. The field performances (i.e., initial reactive and false-positive rates) and practical aspects regarding resources and applicability of the tests to high-throughput routine testing laboratories were evaluated. The 3 tests proved to be reliable tools when applied to slaughtered samples, showing no or very low false-positive rates (<1 per 100,000 negative samples tested) and low retesting frequencies (0.02–0.26%). When samples from fallen stock were analyzed, performances of the immunochromatographic assay, and especially the chemiluminescence ELISA, were negatively affected, resulting in higher false-positive and retesting rates. On the other hand, both tests are less expensive, much easier to use, provide more rapid results, and adapt well to application in routine laboratories as compared with WB. In the authors' experience, the immunochromatographic assay was a good compromise between performance and convenience.

Key Words: Bovine spongiform encephalopathy • cattle • prion protein • rapid tests • surveillance







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.