JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation Vol. 18 Issue 5, 469-472
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNiel, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNiel, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A. F.

Brief Communication

Comparison of Cytogenetics and Polymerase Chain Reaction Based Detection of the Amelogenin Gene Polymorphism for the Diagnosis of Freemartinism In Cattle

Elizabeth A. McNiel1, Nicole J. Madrill, Amy E. Treeful, Lance C. Buoen and Alvin F. Weber

Correspondence: 1 Corresponding Author: Elizabeth A McNiel, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota, 1352 Boyd Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108, mcnie001{at}umn.edu


    Abstract
 TOP
 Sources and manufacturers
 Abstract
 References
 
A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay which detects a sex-based polymorphism in the bovine amelogenin locus was modified and compared to conventional cytogenetic analysis for diagnosis of freemartinism (XX/XY chimerism) in cattle. The PCR assay is more sensitive than cytogenetic analysis for detection of XY cells, with the limit of detection of the assay falling between 0.2% and 1% XY cells. Seventy-three heifer blood samples submitted for evaluation of freemartinism to the University of Minnesota Diagnostic Laboratory were tested using both cytogenetic and PCR techniques. Poor-quality samples precluded successful lymphocyte culture and recovery of mitotic nuclei for cytogenetic evaluation in 17 cases (23%). Two of these samples (2.7%) also failed to amplify with PCR. There was 100% agreement in the results from the 56 samples that were suitable for testing using both techniques. This PCR-based assay provides an alternative to the more laborious cytogenetic evaluation for diagnosis of freemartinism.

Key Words: Amelogenin • cattle • chimera • cytogenetics • freemartin • PCR

A freemartin is an infertile female heifer that is born with a male twin and demonstrates incomplete development of the genital tract. Arrest of the female reproductive tract development in utero results from humoral factors that derive from the male co-twin through conjoined chorionic blood vessels.8 Freemartins are chimeric animals having cells with an XX karyotype, characteristic of females, as well as cells with an XY karyotype, characteristic of males. Cytogenetic analysis of cultured lymphocytes has been traditionally used to identify XY cells in suspected freemartins. Cytogenetic testing is thought to be 95%–99% accurate when 100 mitotic cells are studied.2 In addition, cytogenetic analysis for freemartinism allows detection of other reproductive problems, such as chromosomal centric fusions.1, 10, 11 However, there are limitations to cytogenetic testing. For instance, male cells may be few in number, requiring evaluation of hundreds of cells for a definitive diagnosis.2 Furthermore, cytogenetic testing requires extremely careful collection and handling of samples, is labor intensive, and requires cytogenetics expertise that is not readily available at most diagnostic centers.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based testing has been explored as an alternative to cytogenetic examination for the detection of freemartinism.37, 9 One such technique, described by Ennis and Gallagher, is based on a polymorphism associated with the bovine amelogenin gene (AMX/Y).10 The AMX/Y allele residing on the Y chromosome contains a 63-bp deletion in the fifth exon when compared to the AMX/Y allele residing on the X chromosome. A PCR technique based on amplification of the region of AMX/Y containing this deletion uses a single primer pair to amplify a 280-bp fragment from the X chromosome and a 217-bp fragment from the Y chromosome.3 Because a freemartin carries both XX and XY cells, this PCR technique can be used in the diagnosis of this condition. Although a variety of PCR-based techniques can be used for sexing cattle, an advantage of this technique is that a single pair of oligonucleotide primers is used to amplify both the AMX and AMY alleles; thus PCR failure cannot be mistaken as a negative test result for freemartinism.10 Yet the competitive nature of this assay could limit its sensitivity. Reports of the use of PCR, including AMX/Y amplification, for detection of freemartinism are limited to a few animals. Thus our objective was to modify PCR-based detection of the AMX/Y polymorphism for use in our laboratory and to compare it with conventional cytogenetic analysis in a diagnostic setting.

The primary modification of the PCR technique involved the use of separated lymphocytes in lieu of whole blood in the PCR reaction. Lymphocyte count and blood sample quality can vary considerably in clinical samples; therefore, concentrated lymphocytes or isolated DNA make more appropriate substrates than whole blood for a small-volume PCR-based assay. Low lymphocyte counts in whole blood could be insufficient to detect an XX/XY chimera with very small numbers of XY cells. It is important that thousands of lymphocytes be included in each PCR reaction, because infertility is reported in XX/XY chimeric cows in which the ratio of male to female cells is as low as 1:100. In our hands, lymphocyte separation was less expensive and less labor-intensive than DNA isolation; thus, separated lymphocytes were used as the substrate for PCR.

Blood samples were stored at 4°C for no more than 10 days before lymphocyte preparation. Whole blood was diluted 1:1 with 0.9% NaCl and layered on top of Ficoll-Paque PLUSa (2 volumes diluted blood to 1 volume Ficoll-Paque). The sample was centrifuged at 400 g for 30 minutes in a clinical centrifuge, and the lymphocyte layer was removed for PCR analysis. Four µl of the isolated lymphocyte suspension was added to 10 µl water. This suspension was subjected to 3 cycles of heating (100°C for 3 minutes) and cooling (55°C for 3 minutes) and then was maintained at 4°C. Polymerase chain reaction reagents (1x PCR Master Mixb and 0.2 µM (final) each of forward and reverse primer oligonucleotidesc (SE 47 5' CAGCCAAACCTCCCTCTGC and SE 48 5'CCCGCTTGGTCTTGTCTGTTGC)) were added to yield a final volume of 50 µl. The PCR reactions were carried out in a Hybaid thermocycler.d Samples were initially denatured at 97°C for 3 minutes, then subjected to 35 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 1 minute), annealing (temperatures evaluated ranged from 45°C to 65°C for 1 minute), and extension (72°C for 1 minute). A final extension step was performed at 72°C for 10 minutes, after which the samples were cooled and maintained at 4°C.

Polymerase chain reaction products were evaluated using agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% agarosee gel in Tris-Borate-EDTA) (0.045 M Tris-Boratef, 0.001 M EDTAf). The gel was visualized under UV light for X chromosome (AMX; 280 bp) and Y chromosome (AMY; 217 bp) amelogenin gene PCR products based upon comparison with a standard DNA ladder.g Discrete bands corresponding to the size of the AMX and AMY amplification products were obtained for annealing temperatures ranging from 55°C to 70°C (Fig. 1A, 1B). In addition to bands corresponding to AMX and AMY products, a band representing a more slowly migrating heteroduplex of AMX and AMY products was also evident in samples from bulls. There was also evidence of significant primer dimer formation, which results from high complementarity between the oligonucleotide primers. However, these bands were distinct from the AMX and AMY bands. The effects of annealing temperature on PCR products obtained from mixed suspensions of bovine lymphocytes containing 1% XY cells (99% XX) were also investigated, since 1% is the limit of detection of our standard cytogenetic protocol. As with the bull lymphocytes, nonspecific bands were identified at annealing temperatures below 55°C. At higher temperatures, up to and including 65°C, there was adequate amplification of the AMX and AMY products (Fig. 1C).


Figure 18050801
View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Optimization of annealing temperature for PCR-based amplification of the AMX/Y gene. Separated lymphocytes from a normal cow (A), a normal bull (B), and a mixture of bull and cow lymphocytes containing 1% XY cells (99% XX cells) (C) were used in the PCR reactions. Lane 1 contains a size standard (100-bp ladder). Lanes 2 through 13 contain PCR products obtained using annealing temperatures ranging from 55°C to 70°C (A and B) and from 45°C to 60°C (C). Bands corresponding to the AMX and AMY alleles from the X and Y chromosome, respectively, as well as a heteroduplex of AMX and AMY products are indicated.

 
To investigate the limit of detection of the PCR assay, lymphocytes from a fertile, cytogenetically normal cow and bull were mixed to establish suspensions of equal cell concentration and known ratios of male to female cells. Suspensions of lymphocytes containing 0%, 0.2%, 1%, 10%, and 100% male cells were evaluated using the PCR as described above (annealing temperature = 56°C). For the 1% and 10% male lymphocyte mixtures, both X and Y chromosome amelogenin amplification products could be clearly visualized following agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 2). At a concentration of 0.2% male lymphocytes, the Y-chromosome amelogenin product became indistinct. Thus the limit of detection of the modified assay falls between 0.2% and 1% male cells, demonstrating an increase in sensitivity compared to our conventional cytogenetic protocol, which involves the evaluation of 100 cells.


Figure 18050802
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The limit of detection of the modified PCR assay for Y chromosome amelogenin gene polymorphism was evaluated using mixtures of male and female lymphocytes. Lane 1: DNA size standard (25-bp ladder). Lanes 2 through 6 demonstrate PCR products for mixed lymphocytes with the following concentration of XY cells: 10%, 1%, 0.2%, 0%, 100%. Lane 7 contains a blank control.

 
To compare the modified PCR assay with cytogenetic evaluation, all blood samples submitted to the University of Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for evaluation of freemartinism between September and December of 2003 were evaluated with both techniques. For cytogenetic evaluation, heparinized whole blood was cultured 1:10 in RPMI mediah containing 20% fetal calf serum,i 1 mM L-glutamine,j 50 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin,k 20 mM HEPES.f Pokeweed mitogenf (0.01 mg/ml final) was added to stimulate lymphocyte proliferation. Samples were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 3–5 days. Colcemidee (0.1 µg/ml final) was added to samples 2 hours prior to harvesting. To harvest mitotic nuclei, samples were centrifuged at 1000 x g for 15 minutes and supernatant was removed. Cell pellets were resuspended in 0.075 M potassium chloride (hypotonic) that had been warmed to 37°C and incubated for 15 minutes. Following hypotonic treatment, samples were again centrifuged. The cell pellet was fixed by addition of 3:1 methanolb:acetic acidb solution for 15 minutes at room temperature. The methanol:acetic acid fixation was repeated 2–3 times. After the final centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in a small amount of 3:1 methanol:acetic acid and the cell suspension was dropped on microscope slides. The slides were dried, stained with Leishman stain,f and examined using light microscopy. For each sample, 100 metaphase spreads were examined for sex chromosomes.

Of the 73 samples submitted, 17 samples failed to yield analyzable mitotic spreads for cytogenetic analysis, probably as a result of poor sample quality. Fifteen of these samples were analyzable using PCR. Two samples failed to yield diagnostic results using either PCR or cytogenetic testing. Again, we suspect that sample quality issues were involved in the PCR failure. Thus, all cases that could be evaluated using cytogenetic techniques were also suitable for PCR testing. For the 56 samples that were suitable for evaluation using both PCR and cytogenetics, there was 100% concordance between the 2 tests. Fifty of these heifers were diagnosed as freemartins, and 6 were diagnosed as normal heifers. For the remaining 17 samples, which could not be assessed using cytogenetic analysis, PCR testing established 11 animals as freemartins and 4 as normal heifers.

To the authors' knowledge, this study comparing a PCR-based detection of freemartinism with cytogenetic evaluation involves a larger number of cases than previous reports. The data indicate that PCR-based testing is more likely to achieve a diagnostic result, even on samples that fail to yield analyzable chromosome spreads following culture. Cytogenetic testing is much more technically difficult, time-consuming, and dependent on sample handling. Ambient temperatures during storage and shipping may adversely affect the ability to culture lymphocytes, whereas these issues would be less likely to affect simply recovering cells (or DNA) for PCR. Bacterial contamination of blood and culture media is also a potential pitfall that is less likely to affect PCR.

The PCR-based assay is more sensitive than cytogenetic evaluation, although limited to the detection of no less than 1 in 500 cells. The competitive nature of this PCR assay and perhaps the use of cells instead of isolated DNA could be responsible for limiting the sensitivity. The clinical relevance of detecting small numbers of XY cells much below 1 in 500 is questionable. The authors are unaware of reports suggesting that such animals exist or are infertile.

It is important to consider that PCR is not without limitations. Exclusive use of PCR in the evaluation of cattle would allow for other cytogenetic abnormalities that may significantly impact fertility to be missed.10 It is also possible to conceive of genetic abnormalities that could lead to false inaccurate results. We would expect such events to be rare. In conclusion, PCR-based amplification of bovine amelogenin gene in the region of a sex-specific polymorphism offers an effective means of identifying freemartins.


    Sources and manufacturers
 TOP
 Sources and manufacturers
 Abstract
 References
 
From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108. Back

a. Amersham Biosciences Corporation, Piscataway, NJ. Back

b. Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Back

c. Advanced Genetic Analysis Center, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN. Back

d. Thermo Electron Corporation, Woburn, MA. Back

e. Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA. Back

f. Sigma-Aldrich Corporate Offices, St. Louis, MO. Back

g. New England Biolabs Incorporated, Beverly, MA. Back

h. Biowhittaker Incorporated, Walkersville, MD. Back

i. Summit Biotechnology, Fort Collins, CO. Back

j. ICN Biomedicals, Aruora, OH. Back

k. Cellgrow, Mediatech, Herndon, VA. Back


    References
 TOP
 Sources and manufacturers
 Abstract
 References
 

  1. Buoen L.C., Weber A.F., Meiske J.C., Hooker E.C.: 1998, Cases of 1/29 Robertsonian translocation (centric fusion) in Charolais cattle. Can Vet J 29:455–457.
  2. Dunn H.O., Johnson R.H.: 1981, Sample size for detection of Y-chromosomes in lymphocytes of possible freemartins. Cornell Vet 71:297–304.[Medline]
  3. Ennis S., Gallagher T.F.: 1994, A PCR-based sex-determination assay in cattle based on the bovine amelogenin locus. Anim Genet 25:425–427.[Medline]
  4. Ennis S., Vaughan L., Gallagher T.F.: 1999, The diagnosis of freemartinism in cattle using sex-specific DNA sequences. Res Vet Sci 67:11–112.
  5. Fujishiro A., Kawakura K., Miyake Y.I., Kaneda Y.: 1995, A fast, convenient diagnosis of the bovine freemartin syndrome using polymerase chain reaction. Theriogenology 43:883–891.[Medline]
  6. Lipkin E., Tikoschinsky Y., Arbel R., et al.: 1993, Early PCR amplification test for identifying chimerism in female calves co-twin to a male in cattle. Anim Biotech 4:195–201.
  7. Olsaker I., Jorgensen C.B., Hellemann A.L., et al.: 1993, A fast and highly sensitive method for detecting freemartinism in bovine twins using immunomagnetic beads and Y-specific PCR primers. Anim Genet 24:311–313.[Medline]
  8. Ruvinsky A., Spicer L.J.: 1999, Developmental genetics. In: The genetics of cattle, ed Fries R., Ruvinsky A., pp. 458–460. CAB International, New York, NY.
  9. Schellander K., Peli J., Taha T.A., et al.: 1992, Diagnosis of bovine freemartinism by the polymerase chain reaction method. Anim Genet 23:549–551.[Medline]
  10. Seguin B.E., Zhang T., Buoen L.C., et al.: 2000, Cytogenetic survey of Holstein bulls at a commercial artificial insemination company to determine the prevalence of bulls with centric fusion and chimeric anomalies. J Am Vet Med Assoc 216:65–67.[Medline]
  11. Zhang T., Buoen L.C., Seguin B.E., et al.: 1994, Diagnosis of freemartinism in cattle: the need for clinical and cytogenetic evaluation. J Am Vet Med Assoc 204:1672–1675.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Citek, J. Rubes, and J. Hajkova
Short communication: Robertsonian translocations, chimerism, and aneuploidy in cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3481 - 3483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNiel, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNiel, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS