JVDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation Vol. 19 Issue 1, 106-108
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willis, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Grenache, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willis, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Grenache, D. G.

Brief Communications

Bovine cardiac troponin T is not accurately quantified with a common human clinical immunoassay

Monte S. Willis, Jennifer A. Snyder, Robert H. Poppenga and David G. Grenache1

Correspondence: 1Corresponding Author: David G. Grenache, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, CB#7525, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525.


   Abstract
TOP
 Sources and manufacturers
 Abstract
References
 
The detection of myocardial injury in cattle caused by the ingestion of cardiotoxic compounds or cardiac diseases would be facilitated by the availability of a rapid and specific quantitative serum assay for cardiac troponins. Therefore, the accuracy of the only cardiac troponin T (cTnT) immunoassay to receive approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for the measurement of cTnT in human serum was evaluated to quantify the protein in bovine serum. Recovery experiments were performed by the addition of purified bovine cTnT to normal bovine serum. Cardiac troponin T was quantified using an immunoassay commonly used for the measurement of cTnT in human serum. The immunoassay demonstrated a well correlated (r = 0.99) and linear dose-dependent response to bovine cTnT but with poor accuracy (slope = 0.024; 95% CI = 0.018 to 0.030). The mean recovery of bovine cTnT was 2.4% across a concentration range of 10 ng/ml to 1,000 ng/ml. These studies demonstrate that a commonly used immunoassay for the measurement of cTnT in human serum demonstrates poor accuracy for the quantification of bovine cTnT.

Key Words: Bos taurus • bovine • cardiac troponin • cows • immunoassay • myocardial injury

Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is a cardiac specific marker used in the diagnosis of myocardial cell injury in humans and is elevated in myocardial infarction,7 congestive heart failure,20 cardiomyopathy,19 sepsis,21 and myocarditis.9 Moderate increases in cTnT may be observed in patients with clinically stable renal disease but without acute coronary syndromes compromising the specificity of the biomarker.11 There is a need to accurately and quickly determine myocardial injury in nonhuman animal models of cardiac injury and in routine veterinary medicine. Several cardiotoxic compounds cause morbidity and mortality in cattle, including ionophore feed additives, gossypol, and cardiac glycosides found in plants such as Nerium oleander, Asclepias spp., and Digitalis purpurea.2,4,8,13 In addition, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis caused by a variety of etiologies occur in cattle.17 The antemortem assessment of the presence and extent of cardiac damage associated with toxic and nontoxic etiologies would be facilitated by the availability of a specific biomarker of myocardial cell damage. Such a biomarker could also be employed for prognostic purposes. The use of cTnT detection as a biomarker of cardiac injury has been shown in canine, mouse, and ferret models.14 Limited information is available regarding its performance in other animal species. A recent case report described the use of a qualitative cTnT assay in the diagnosis of myocardial injury in a calf with severe myocarditis.5 This report describes an investigation regarding the ability of the only immunoassaya to receive approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for the measurement of cTnT in human serum to detect and accurately quantify bovine cTnT.

The immunoassay used for this report is a third-generation electrochemiluminescent immunometric assay designed for the in vitro quantification of human cTnT in serum. This assay uses 2 monoclonal antibodies, M7 and M11.7, recognizing independent adjacent epitopes composed of amino acid positions 125–131 and 136–147, respectively, located in the central part of the 288 amino acid protein.3,12,18 The assay coefficient of variation (CV) is 10% at a concentration of 0.04 ng/ml (human cTnT).16

The accuracy of the immunoassay to detect bovine cTnT was determined using recovery experiments. Two different lots of a commercial preparation of bovine cTnTb that is >98% pure by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and designed for use as an immunoassay standard were used. Normal bovine serum was obtained from a healthy Holstein cow maintained by the University of California–Davis School of Veterinary Medicine. Bovine cTnT (100 µg) was reconstituted with either normal bovine serum or a Tris buffer recommended by the manufacturer of the protein (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 7 M urea, 15 mM mercaptoethanol) to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml and added to normal bovine serum to yield expected cTnT concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 100, and 1,000 ng/ml. Cardiac TnT concentrations were determined in quadruplicate in 2 separate recovery experiments.

The immunoassay demonstrated a well correlated (r = 0.99) linear, dose-dependent response to bovine cTnT reconstituted in normal bovine serum although it did not accurately quantify the protein (slope = 0.009; 95% CI = 0.0087 to 0.0095). The recovery of reconstituted bovine cTnT in normal bovine serum was approximately 100-fold less than was expected and ranged from a mean of 1.2% (95% CI = –0.03 to 2.4) at 10 ng/ml to a mean of 0.9% (95% CI = 0.8 to 1.0) at 1,000 ng/ml.

One possible explanation for the low recovery was incomplete reconstitution of the commercial cTnT. The initial concentration of 20 µg/ml was not verifiable, as this material had been reconstituted in normal bovine serum. Therefore, the recovery experiments were repeated using a different lot of commercial bovine cTnT reconstituted in Tris buffer to achieve a concentration of 20 µg/ml. A Bradford protein assay1 used in accordance to the manufacturer's instructionsc confirmed the final protein concentration was 20.5 µg/ml. The concentration of buffer in the prepared specimens did not interfere with the analytical performance of the immunoassay (data not shown). Consistent with the initial experiments, the immunoassay demonstrated a well correlated (r = 0.99) linear, dose-dependent response yet it remained unable to accurately quantify the protein (slope = 0.039; 95% CI = 0.038 to 0.041). Recovery of bovine cTnT reconstituted in Tris buffer was slightly improved from that reconstituted in normal bovine serum and ranged from a mean of 3.8% (95% CI = 3.7 to 4.0) at 10 ng/ml to a mean of 3.9% (95% CI = 3.4 to 4.4) at 1,000 ng/ml. When the data from both recovery experiments were combined, linear regression analysis indicated an average recovery of 2.4% (95% CI = 1.8 to 3.0) (Fig. 1).


Figure 19011801
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1 The immunoassay demonstrates a linear, dose-dependent response to bovine cTnT but recovers only 2.4% of added protein (Y = 0.024(X) – 0.05). The points show the average of quadruplicate measurements from 2 separate experiments. The solid line is the best fit line, and the error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

 
To determine if the low recovery was because of interferences that might have been present in the normal bovine serum, immunoassay standards were added across a broad concentration range to the bovine serum, and cTnT was quantified in singlicate. Recovery over a cTnT range of 0.16–20.0 ng/ml averaged 131% indicating that there was nothing in the bovine serum that would account for the low recovery of bovine cTnT.

Bovine cTnT is homologous to the cTnT of other animals, such as chicken, rabbit, quail, and rat.10 Bovine and human cTnT amino acid sequences were compared by querying the Entrez Protein Database (NCBI) and found human (NP_001001430, NP_777196, P13789) and bovine (Bos taurus) (AAD51066) cTnT amino acid sequences. Overall, the 2 cTnT amino acid sequences share 88.9% identity. The epitope recognized by M7 is identical in the bovine protein with the exception of a lysine in place of an arginine at position 126 (position 129 in the human protein). Similarly, the epitope recognized by M11.7 is identical in the bovine protein with the exception of an alanine in place of an asparagine at position 139 (position 142 in the human protein). These minor differences at the 2 antibody recognition sites likely account for the poor recovery of bovine cTnT by the immunoassay.

These findings demonstrate that this immunoassay is not sufficiently analytically sensitive to accurately quantify bovine cTnT despite the similarity of amino acid sequences in the recognized epitopes between the human and bovine proteins. The 2 antibodies used in this third-generation immunoassay were previously used by the manufacturer in its second-generation assay.12 Interestingly, the standard for the second-generation assay used a bovine cTnT standard, and an earlier report indicated that the M11.7 antibody had a low affinity for bovine cTnT, largely because it was produced using a human cTnT immunogen.6 The third-generation assay uses recombinant human cTnT as standards.

The successful use by the manufacturer of bovine standards in the second-generation assay and the good linearity identified in this study from the third-generation assay both indicate that the third-generation assay may actually be able to accurately quantify bovine cTnT if appropriately calibrated with bovine standards. Alternatively, the assay might still be clinically useful if used to simply detect increased concentrations of cTnT in bovine serum. Based on the linear regression equation obtained from the combined recovery data and the 0.04 ng/ml functional sensitivity of the assay, a bovine cTnT concentration >3.75 ng/ml is quite likely to be clinically significant. Indeed, a rapid qualitative assayd with an analytical sensitivity of 0.08 ng/ml developed for the detection of cTnT in human serum produced a positive result with serum collected from a calf with histologically confirmed myocardial necrosis.5 Regrettably, this case report provided no quantitative cTnT data, making it difficult to evaluate the analytical performance of the device. However, to be most clinically effective, any assay for cTnT (qualitative or quantitative) requires meaningful information regarding the upper reference limit of cTnT in cattle, and this remains unknown. Although other markers of myocardial injury were not investigated, such as cardiac troponin I (cTnI), a report by O'Brien et al. suggests that some cTnI immunoassays may produce accurate quantification of cTnI in bovine serum.15

In summary, the only immunoassay to receive approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for the measurement of cTnT in human serum has poor accuracy for quantifying cTnT in bovine serum. This could limit its usefulness in detecting myocardial necrosis in cattle.


   Sources and manufacturers
TOP
 Sources and manufacturers
Abstract
 References
 
From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525 (Willis, Snyder, Grenache), and the School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, West Health Sciences Drive, Davis, CA 95616 (Poppenga). Back

a. Roche Elecsys Troponin T STAT immunoassay, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany. Back

b. Bovine cTnT, HyTest Ltd., Turku, Finland. Back

c. Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay, BioRad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA. Back

d. TropT, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany. Back


   References
TOP
 Sources and manufacturers
 Abstract
 References
 

  1. Bradford M.M.: 1976, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254.[Medline]
  2. Burrows G.E., Tyrl R.J.: 1989, Plants causing sudden death in livestock. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 5:263–289.[Medline]
  3. Davis G.K., Labugger R., Van Eyk J.E., Apple F.S.: 2001, Cardiac troponin T is not detected in Western blots of diseased renal tissue. Clin Chem 47:782–783.[Free Full Text]
  4. Galey F.D., Holstege D.M., Plumlee K.H., et al.: 1996, Diagnosis of oleander poisoning in livestock. J Vet Diagn Invest 8:358–364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gunes V., Erdogan H.M., Citil M., Ozcan K.: 2005, Assay of cardiac troponins in the diagnosis of myocardial degeneration due to foot-and-mouth disease in a calf. Vet Rec 156:714–715.[Medline]
  6. Hallermayer K., Klenner D., Vogel R.: 1999, Use of recombinant human cardiac Troponin T for standardization of third generation Troponin T methods. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 230:128–131.[Medline]
  7. Katus H.A., Remppis A., Neumann F.J., et al.: 1991, Diagnostic efficiency of troponin T measurements in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 83:902–912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kerr L.A.: 1989, Gossypol toxicosis in cattle. Compend Contin Edu Pract Vet 11:1139–1143.
  9. Lauer B., Niederau C., Kuhl U., et al.: 1997, Cardiac troponin T in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1354–1359.[Abstract]
  10. Leszyk J., Dumaswala R., Potter J.D., et al.: 1987, Bovine cardiac troponin T: amino acid sequences of the two isoforms. Biochemistry 26:7035–7042.[Medline]
  11. Mockel M., Schindler R., Knorr L., et al.: 1999, Prognostic value of cardiac troponin T and I elevations in renal disease patients without acute coronary syndromes: a 9-month outcome analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:1489–1495.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Muller-Bardorff M., Hallermayer K., Schroder A., et al.: 1997, Improved troponin T ELISA specific for cardiac troponin T isoform: assay development and analytical and clinical validation. Clin Chem 43:458–466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Novilla M.N.: 1992, The veterinary importance of the toxic syndrome induced by ionophores. Vet Hum Toxicol 34:66–70.[Medline]
  14. O'Brien P.J., Dameron G.W., Beck M.L., et al.: 1997, Cardiac troponin T is a sensitive, specific biomarker of cardiac injury in laboratory animals. Lab Anim Sci 47:486–495.[Medline]
  15. O'Brien P.J., Landt Y., Ladenson J.H.: 1997, Differential reactivity of cardiac and skeletal muscle from various species in a cardiac troponin I immunoassay. Clin Chem 43:2333–2338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Panteghini M., Pagani F., Yeo K.T., et al.: 2004, Evaluation of imprecision for cardiac troponin assays at low-range concentrations. Clin Chem 50:327–332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Reef V.B., McGuirk S.M.: 2002, Disease of the cardiovascular system. In: Large animal internal medicine, ed. Smith B.P., 3rd ed., pp. 443–478. Mosby, St. Louis, MO.
  18. Ricchiuti V., Voss E.M., Ney A., et al.: 1998, Cardiac troponin T isoforms expressed in renal diseased skeletal muscle will not cause false-positive results by the second generation cardiac troponin T assay by Boehringer Mannheim. Clin Chem 44:1919–1924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sato Y., Kataoka K., Matsumori A., et al.: 1997, Measuring serum aminoterminal type III procollagen peptide, 7 S domain of type IV collagen, and cardiac troponin T in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and secondary cardiomyopathy. Heart 78:505–508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Setsuta K., Seino Y., Takahashi N., et al.: 1999, Clinical significance of elevated levels of cardiac troponin T in patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 84:608–611, A609.[Medline]
  21. ver Elst K.M., Spapen H.D., Nguyen D.N., et al.: 2000, Cardiac troponins I and T are biological markers of left ventricular dysfunction in septic shock. Clin Chem 46:650–657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willis, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Grenache, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willis, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Grenache, D. G.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS