Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation Vol. 19 Issue 5, 532-534
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians
Differentiation of Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov. from other coccoid moraxellae by the use of polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis of amplified DNA
John A. Angelos1 and
Louise M. Ball
Correspondence: 1Corresponding Author: John A. Angelos, Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, 2108 Tupper Hall, Davis, CA 95616, e-mail: jaangelos{at}ucdavis.edu
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Moraxella ovis was historically the only coccoid Moraxella identified in cultures of ocular fluid from cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK) and could be morphologically and biochemically differentiated from Moraxella bovis. Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov. is a recently characterized Moraxella isolated from ulcerated eyes of calves with IBK in northern California in 2002. Like Moraxella ovis, M. bovoculi sp. nov. is a gram-negative coccus/diplococcus. All 18 original isolates of M. bovoculi sp. nov. possessed phenylalanine deaminase (PADase) activity and could therefore be differentiated from M. ovis and M. bovis. During the characterization of 44 additional isolates of hemolytic gram-negative cocci that were cultured from ulcerated eyes of IBK-affected calves, 2 PADase-negative isolates were identified that could not be differentiated biochemically from M. ovis; however, the DNA sequence of the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region (ISR) of the isolates matched the 16S-23S ISR DNA sequence of M. bovoculi sp. nov. To facilitate the identification of PADase-negative moraxellae, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with restriction enzyme digestion analysis of amplified DNA was developed. Amplification of the 16S-23S ISR followed by AfaI digestion of amplified DNA could differentiate M. bovoculi sp. nov. from M. ovis and other moraxellae. The DNA sequence analysis of the amplified 16S-23S ISR from the 42 PADase-positive isolates of hemolytic gram-negative cocci indicated that all were M. bovoculi sp. nov. and all possessed an AfaI site. A PCR coupled with restriction analysis of amplified DNA can aid in identifying M. bovoculi sp. nov.
Key Words: Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis, IBK Moraxella bovis Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov., Moraxella ovis
Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK; pinkeye) is the most common ocular disease of cattle; affected animals exhibit corneal ulceration leading to corneal scarring of varying severity. Koch's postulates have been satisfied for Moraxella bovis and IBK.12 Pathogenic proteins of M. bovis include pilin that enable the organism to attach to corneal epithelial cells4,16,18 and a pore-forming cytotoxin9 (cytolysin; hemolysin) that lyses corneal epithelial cells7 and host neutrophils resulting in a release of neutrophil-derived degradative enzymes into corneal stroma.14,15,20 The M. bovis cytotoxin is an RTX (repeats in the structural toxin) toxin designated MbxA encoded by an RTXA gene (mbxA)1 that is contained within an RTX operon (mbx operon)2 that resides on a pathogenicity island in M. bovis.13
Along with M. bovis, other gram-negative bacteria have been identified in ocular fluid from the eyes of normal and IBK-affected cattle. These bacteria have variously been designated hemolytic diplococci,19 hemolytic Neisseria,11 Neisseria spp.,5,6,21 Neisseria (Branhamella) catarrhalis,22 or Moraxella ovis.8,10 During an IBK antibiotic efficacy trial conducted in Northern California during the summer of 2002, hemolytic gram-negative cocci isolated from the ulcerated eyes of dairy and beef calves were further characterized. DNA sequence analyses and biochemical testing demonstrated that 18 characterized isolates were distinct from M. bovis and M. ovis and as such represented a novel species that was named Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov., within the genus Moraxella.3 M. bovoculi sp. nov. could be differentiated from M. bovis and M. ovis as well as other moraxellae isolated from animals on the basis of positive phenylalanine deaminase (PADase) activity.
During an IBK vaccine trial conducted during the summer of 2005, ulcerated eyes of calves were cultured, and a total of 44 additional isolates of hemolytic gram-negative cocci were characterized. Forty-two were PADase positive and were identified as M. bovoculi sp. nov.; however, 2 PADase-negative isolates (120L and 159R) could not be readily differentiated from M. ovis on the basis of PADase activity. To facilitate the molecular identification of PADase-positive or -negative hemolytic gram-negative coccoid moraxellae, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with restriction enzyme analysis was developed.
Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov. (44 isolates), M. ovis,a M. bovis Tifton I,b Moraxella caprae,c and Moraxella boevreid were propagated on 5% sheep blood agare at 35°C; strains were stored frozen in 10% skim milk–50% glycerol at –80°C. To prepare genomic DNA, 1 loopful of bacteria was scraped from plates and resuspended in 500 µl of sterile deionized water, and genomic DNA was harvested according to the manufacturer's instructions.f Primers for amplifying the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region (ISR) were developed from the DNA sequence of the 16S rDNA gene, the 16S-23S ISR, and a portion of the 23S rDNA gene from M. bovis, M. ovis, and M. bovoculi sp. nov.3 The PCR primers used were ISRdown (5'-GTG AAG TCG TAA CAA GGT AGC CGT-3') and ISRup (5'-ACC GAC GCT TAT CGC AGG CTA TCA-3'). The PCR reactions were made up to a final volume of 50 µl with ultra pure waterg and contained 3 µl of genomic DNA template, 0.4 µl (2U) Taq DNA polymerase,h 5 µl of 10x PCR buffer (the final 1x buffer was 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM MgSO4, 10 mM KCl, 8 mM [NH4]2SO4, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 9.0], and 0.05% NP-40), 0.5 µl of 10 mM dNTP,i and 2.5 µl of each primer (10 pmole/µl). The reactions were run in a thermocyclerj using an initial denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 50°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. Fifteen microliters of the resulting PCR reaction was mixed with 0.5 µl (4U) of AfaIk and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. Following incubation, 5 µl of the original PCR reaction and 5 µl of the AfaI digested PCR reaction were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gell containing 0.25 µg/ml of ethidium bromidem in 1x TAE buffer (0.04 M Tris-acetate; 0.001 M EDTA). The gel was visualized on an ultraviolet lightboxn and photographed.o The ISRdown-ISRup amplicon generated from genomic DNA was sequenced directly with primers ISRdown and ISRup.p
ISRdown-ISRup amplified DNA exhibited a single band of
600 bp for M. bovoculi sp. nov. and M. ovis and
650 bp for M. bovis, M. boevrei, and M. caprae (Fig. 1). AfaI digestion of amplified DNA cut the
600 bp amplicon from M. bovoculi sp. nov. at 1 site, resulting in 2 bands of
450 and
150 bp. The original amplicons generated for M. bovis, M. ovis, M. boevrei, and M. caprae were not cut by AfaI and remained as a single band (Fig. 1). For the 44 isolates examined, the DNA sequence of the 16S–23S ISR amplified by the ISRdown-ISRup primers matched the previously reported 16S–23S intergenic spacer sequence for M. bovoculi sp. nov. (Genbank accession DQ153085).3

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 The genomic DNA from Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov. 38L (lane A), 117L (lane B), 120L (lane C), 159R (lane D), 237 (lane E), Moraxella ovis ATCC 33078 (lane F), Moraxella ovis ATCC 19575 (lane G), Moraxella ovis ATCC 19576 (lane H), Moraxella bovis Tifton I (lane I), Moraxella boevrei ATCC 700022 (lane J), and Moraxella caprae ATCC 700019 (lane K) was amplified with primers flanking the 16S rDNA-23S rDNA intergenic spacer region. Following amplification, an aliquot of the PCR reaction product was digested with AfaI at 37°C for 1 hour. Five microliters of restriction digested (lane 1) or undigested (lane 2) DNA was electorphoresed on a 2% agarose gel. The 600-bp amplified product from PADase-negative (isolates 120L and 159R) and PADase-positive (isolates 38L, 117L, and 237) M. bovoculi sp. nov. was cut once by AfaI into 450- and 150-bp fragments. The amplicon generated for the other Moraxella spp. were not cut by AfaI. Approximate molecular mass markers are indicated in bp.
|
|
The method described above for identifying hemolytic gram-negative cocci that are PADase negative as M. bovoculi sp. nov. is rapid and can be accomplished within a single day following colony purification and genomic DNA extraction. While the method described above was useful for differentiating PADase-negative M. bovoculi sp. nov. from M. ovis, it might also be useful in identifying hemolytic gram-negative cocci cultured from eyes of cattle in the absence of a PADase test result. The DNA sequencing results for the amplified ISR region in all 44 isolates of what were identified as M. bovoculi sp. nov. indicated that the region is well conserved and all 44 isolates possessed an AfaI site. While the selected primers amplified DNA from all 5 Moraxella spp., the restriction enzyme was chosen to recognize a site that was present only in the amplicon generated for M. bovoculi sp. nov. It is possible that mutations could lead to misidentification of M. bovoculi sp. nov. if PCR and restriction analysis were the only tests used for identification. Nevertheless, the 44 additional isolates of M. bovoculi sp. nov. from summer 2005 all had 16S–23S ISR DNA sequences that matched previously reported 16S–23S ISR DNA sequences of M. bovoculi sp. nov., and all had an AfaI site in the amplified ISR region.
During the original characterization of M. bovoculi sp. nov., the M. ovis chosen for comparison was a type strain of M. ovis (ATCC 33078) that was originally cultured from a sheep with keratoconjunctivitis.17 Other species of gram-negative cocci have been isolated from cattle with IBK, and these have historically been referred to as Moraxella, Branhamella, or Neisseria spp./ovis.5,6,8,10,11,21,22 It is possible that some agents historically identified as M. ovis might have fit the description of M. bovoculi sp. nov., and as such, future descriptions of bacteria identified as M. ovis or M. bovoculi sp. nov. should conclusively demonstrate speciation of these isolates. While biochemical testing has traditionally been used to differentiate moraxellae, a determination of the 16S–23S ISR DNA sequence may help to speciate the coccoid moraxellae, especially PADase-negative coccoid moraxellae isolated from cattle with IBK. Future studies on more geographically diverse isolates of M. bovoculi sp. nov. should help elucidate whether additional genetic and biochemical variability exists among isolates of this species. Until additional M. bovoculi sp. nov. are characterized at the molecular level, it may be most informative to use a combination of morphologic, biochemical, and molecular analyses to positively identify Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
Funding for completion of this work was provided by the University of California School of Veterinary Medicine Dean's Office Start Up Funds for New Faculty.
 |
Sources and manufacturers
|
|---|
From the Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, 2108 Tupper Hall, Davis, CA 95616. 
a. ATCC 33078, ATCC 19575, and ATCC 19576, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. 
b. Provided by Lisle W. George, UC Davis, Davis, CA. 
c. ATCC 700019, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. 
d. ATCC 700022, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. 
e. Veterinary Medicine Biological Media Services, UC Davis, CA. 
f. DNEasy kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA. 
g. Gibco UltraPure molecular biology grade water, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA. 
h. Choice Taq DNA Polymerase, Denville Scientific Inc., South Plainfield, NJ. 
i. 100 mM dNTP Set, Eppendorf, Westbury, NY. 
j. PTC-200 Peltier Thermal Cycler, MJ Research, Inc., Watertown, MA. 
k. AfaI (RsaI), Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ. 
l. GenePure LE Quick Dissolve Agarose, ISC BioExpress, Kaysville, UT. 
m. Sigma, St. Louis, MO. 
n. Dual Light Transilluminator FB-DLT-88A, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA. 
o. Photodocumentation Handheld Camera, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA. 
p. Davis Sequencing, Inc., Davis, CA. 
 |
References
|
|---|
- Angelos J.A., Hess J.F., George L.W.: 2001, Cloning and characterization of a Moraxella bovis cytotoxin gene. Am J Vet Res 62:1222–1228.[Medline]
- Angelos J.A., Hess J.F., George L.W.: 2003, An RTX operon in hemolytic Moraxella bovis is absent from nonhemolytic strains. Vet Microbiol 92:363–377.[Medline]
- Angelos J.A., Spinks P.Q., Ball L.M., George L.W.: 2007, Moraxella bovoculi sp. nov. isolated from calves with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. Int J Syst Evol Micro 57:789–795.
- Annuar B.O., Wilcox G.E.: 1985, Adherence of Moraxella bovis to cell cultures of bovine origin. Res Vet Sci 39:241–246.[Medline]
- Barber D.M.: 1984, Bacterial population of the eyes of slaughter cattle. Vet Rec 115:169 pp.[Medline]
- Barber D.M., Jones G.E., Wood A.: 1986, Microbial flora of the eyes of cattle. Vet Rec 118:204–206.[Abstract]
- Beard M.K., Moore L.J.: 1994, Reproduction of bovine keratoconjunctivitis with a purified haemolytic and cytotoxic fraction of Moraxella bovis. Vet Microbiol 42:15–33.[Medline]
- Cerny H.E., Rogers D.G., Gray J.T., et al.: 2006, Effects of Moraxella (Branhamella) ovis culture filtrates on bovine erythrocytes, peripheral mononuclear cells, and corneal epithelial cells. J Clin Microbiol 44:772–776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Clinkenbeard K.D., Thiessen A.E.: 1991, Mechanism of action of Moraxella bovis hemolysin. Infect Immun 59:1148–1152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Elad D., Yeruham I., Bernstein M.: 1988, Moraxella ovis in cases of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK) in Israel. Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin Reihe B 35:431–434.
- Fairlie G.: 1966, The isolation of a haemolytic Neisseria from cattle and sheep in the North of Scotland. Vet Rec 78:649–650.[Medline]
- Henson J.B., Grumbles L.C.: 1960, Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis. I. Etiology. Am J Vet Res 21:761–766.[Medline]
- Hess J.F., Angelos J.A.: 2006, The Moraxella bovis RTX toxin locus mbx defines a pathogenicity island. J Med Microbiol 55:443–449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kagonyera G.M., George L.W., Munn R.: 1988, Light and electron microscopic changes in corneas of healthy and immunomodulated calves infected with Moraxella bovis. Am J Vet Res 49:386–395.[Medline]
- Kagonyera G.M., George L.W., Munn R.: 1989, Cytopathic effects of Moraxella bovis on cultured bovine neutrophils and corneal epithelial cells. Am J Vet Res 50:10–17.[Medline]
- Lehr C., Jayappa H.G., Goodnow R.A.: 1985, Serologic and protective characterization of Moraxella bovis pili. Cornell Vet 75:484–492.[Medline]
- Lindqvist K.: 1960, A Neisseria species associated with infectious keratoconjunctivitis of sheep—Neisseria ovis nov. spec. J Infect Dis 106:162–165.[Medline]
- Moore L.J., Rutter J.M.: 1989, Attachment of Moraxella bovis to calf corneal cells and inhibition by antiserum. Aust Vet J 66:39–42.[Medline]
- Pugh G.W., Jr, Hughes D.E., McDonald T.J.: 1966, The isolation and characterization of Moraxella bovis. Am J Vet Res 27:957–962.[Medline]
- Rogers D.G., Cheville N.F., Pugh G.W. Jr: 1987, Pathogenesis of corneal lesions caused by Moraxella bovis in gnotobiotic calves. Vet Pathol 24:287–295.[Abstract]
- Spradbrow P.B.: 1967, A microbiological study of bovine conjunctivitis and keratoconjunctivitis. Aust Vet J 43:55–58.[Medline]
- Wilcox G.E.: 1970, Bacterial flora of the bovine eye with special reference to the Moraxella and Neisseria. Aust Vet J 46:253–256.[Medline]