JVDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation Vol. 20 Issue 6, 799-803
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cerón, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cerón, J. J.

Brief Research Reports

Serum total sialic acid in pigs: new possibilities for an old inflammatory biomarker

Laura Soler, Silvia Martínez-Subiela, Fernando Tecles, Ana Gutierrez, Pablo Fuentes and Jose Joaquín Cerón1

Correspondence: 1Corresponding Author: Jose Joaquín Cerón, Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Espinardo Campus, Murcia, Spain. jjceron{at}um.es


   Abstract
TOP
 Abstract
Sources and manufacturers
 References
 
The potential use of total sialic acid (TSA) as an acute-phase biomarker in pigs was investigated through clinical and analytic validation of an automated commercial enzymatic-colorimetric assay. Intra- and interassay precision, accuracy, and detection limit were determined for the analytical validation of the method. The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation (%CV) were 2.27% and 3.99%, respectively, whereas the linearity under dilution calculation resulted in a coefficients of correlation of r = 0.995 and r = 0.999 for TSA high- and low-content serum samples, respectively, which indicated that the automated method was reliable to measure TSA in porcine serum samples. Average serum TSA concentrations in diseased pigs (median: 1779.16 mg/l; 5th percentile: 556.62 mg/l; 95th percentile: 963.06 mg/l) were 2.5-fold higher compared with healthy animals (median: 692.78 mg/l; 5th percentile: 1278.74 mg/l; 95th percentile: 2536.12 mg/l), which indicated that TSA can be considered as a moderate acute phase marker in swine. Therefore, TSA may be useful for detecting inflammatory conditions and could be included in biochemical profiles used to monitor the general status of pigs as a moderate acute phase marker.

Key Words: Automated assay • porcine serum • total sialic acid • validation

The acute-phase response refers to a nonspecific and complex reaction of an animal that occurs shortly after a tissue injury. The origin of this reaction can be attributable to infectious, immunologic, neoplastic, traumatic, or other causes, and its purpose is to restore homeostasis and to remove the cause of its disturbance. This response, among other systemic effects, includes the change in serum concentrations of the so-called acute-phase proteins (APP).11 Testing for these APPs is thought to be a suitable tool for monitoring the health and well-being of pigs.11 At the herd level, APP might be useful for determining in which part of the production system a disturbance is taking place,10 and it may also be applied to measure the efficacy of antibiotic treatment.9

Most APPs are glycoproteins that contain sialic acid.13 Sialic acid is a 9-carbon monosaccharide mainly attached to the oligosaccharide side-chains of many glycoprotein and glycolipids.13 In humans, it is known that serum-sialic-acid concentration rises during the acute-phase reaction, because of an increase in serum concentration of sialic-acid–carrying APPs, as well as a higher degree of sialylation of these proteins.2,13 Hence, sialic acid is considered an acute-phase marker in human medicine.1 The increase in APP in humans accounts for about 70% of circulating total sialic acid (TSA) concentrations during an acute-phase response. Thus, measuring TSA provides an integrated measure of the inflammatory response, which is less prone to day-to-day variability than individual markers. Based on this fact, it has been suggested that a single measurement of serum TSA may be the most useful estimate of an individual's habitual inflammatory status.1 In addition to this role as an inflammation marker, TSA levels have been found to increase in humans during various types of cancer, chronic renal failure, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes.13 In veterinary medicine, several studies carried out on this marker in cattle, dogs, and horses during inflammatory or neoplastic disorders showed that sialic acid can be used as an acute-phase marker in these species.3,8,12,15,16 However, to the authors' knowledge, sialic acid has not been evaluated in swine as an acute-phase marker. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the possible use of serum TSA as an acute-phase marker in pigs by the analytical validation of an automated commercially available method, as well as the estimation of the ability of the assay to differentiate between clinically healthy pigs and pigs with different diseases.

The study sample of animals consisted of 39 conventional Duroc x (Landrace x Large White) pigs from a finishing unit of 1,800 animals. The farm was seropositive to Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), Porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2), Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. The herd vaccination program included vaccination twice against M. hyopneumoniae in the nursery (first week of age with revaccination 3 weeks after) and twice against Suid herpesvirus 1 (gE-negative modified live vaccine with oil in water adjuvant) at 11 and 14 weeks of age. Animals were introduced into the finishing unit with an average age of 190 days and an average weight of 102 kg. All animals in the present study were reared under the welfare conditions described in the European Union Council Directive 91/630/EEC, Council Directive 2001/88/EC, and Commission Directive 2001/93/EC, which detail minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Animals were classified, depending on their health status, into healthy and diseased animals.

The group of healthy animals was composed of 14 pigs from the same fattening unit destined for slaughter, aged 27 weeks, seronegative for PRRSV, PCV-2, M. hyopneumoniae, and A. pleuropneumoniae. These animals were determined to be healthy after a complete physical examination, which included evaluation of body condition, conformation, coat, behavior, posture and gait, abdominal shape, respiration (which included respiratory rate, rhythm, intensity, and type), appetite, and evidence of diarrhea, vomiting, coughing and/or sneezing, and temperature checking. They were transported to the slaughterhouse by following instructions from the European Union (European Directive 2001/88/CE). Transport and lairage never exceeded 3 hr. Animals were slaughtered by cutting the throat, after having been stunned in a chamber that contained carbon dioxide and were bled out with a Rotastick pump.a Blood samples were collected directly from the neck wound produced by the bleeding system by using a single-use blood collection system.b Blood was allowed to clot at room temperature and then was centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 10 min to obtain serum. All serum samples were kept at –20°C until analysis. After slaughter, postmortem and histologic examinations were carried out, and no lesions were found.

The group of diseased animals was composed of 25 pigs aged 27 weeks of age that exhibited various severe clinical signs (i.e., acute dyspnea, cough, fever, lameness, tail bites, and cachexia) and a pronounced weakness, which prohibited shipment to the abattoir; therefore, they were slaughtered at the farm. Blood samples were collected before slaughter by jugular venipuncture by using a single-use blood collection system.b Serum was obtained and preserved as described in the preceding paragraph. After slaughter, postmortem and histologic examinations were carried out. These examinations revealed that all 25 pigs had pulmonary lesions (suppurative/fibrinous bronchopneumonia, embolic/bronchointerstitial pneumonia, or chronic pleurisy), and that 13 of these animals also had other multiorgan lesions (ileitis, polyserositis, tail bites, or chronic arthritis).

The TSA concentrations were determined by using the sialic-acid test kit,c a colorimetric assay for enzymatic measurement of sialic acid in serum samples. The assay starts with the release of sialic-acid molecules bound to the sample glycoconjugates; this results in free sialic acid, which, after several enzymatic steps, is converted into a red chromophore. The absorbance of this chromophore is measured at 550 nm and is then related to the sample's original sialic-acid concentration, with a calibration curve established by using the standard serum included in the kit.

Because the sialic-acid kit was originally designed for manual use, it was necessary to adapt the assay to a Cobas Mira Plus Analyzer.d The adaptation was performed as previously described for canine serum samples,16 with slight modifications. Settings for the Cobas Mira Plus are summarized in Table 1. This automation has several advantages when compared with the manual method, such as higher throughput, use of a lower sample volume per determination, and a significant decrease in the volume of reagents used, which leads to a reduction in the cost of the test.4


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Settings for the Cobas Mira® Plus analyzer for determining porcine serum total sialic acid concentration.

 
Analytical validation of the sialic-acid test was carried out by using 6 porcine serum samples: 3 samples were from healthy animals (samples 1, 2, and 3), which were expected to have low sialic-acid content, and 3 acute-phase serum samples were from diseased animals (samples 4, 5, and 6), which were expected to have high sialic-acid content. Precision was expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV). Intra-assay CVs were determined by analyzing the 6 samples 5 times in a single analytical series. Interassay CVs were determined by analyzing duplicates of the 6 samples on 3 different successive days. Samples were frozen in aliquots, and only vials needed for each analytical run were thawed to prevent variation from repetitive freeze-thaw cycles. The accuracy of the assay was evaluated indirectly by the linearity under the dilution method. For this study, 2 samples with known amounts of TSA were serially diluted (50%, 25%, 12.5%, and 6.25%) with distilled water, and the sialic-acid content was determined. The obtained concentration results were compared with the expected ones by a linear regression analysis, and the ability of the method to measure sialic acid in a proportional and linear way was established.7 To check the minimum measure of TSA that can be detected by the assay with reasonable certainty, the analytical limit of detection (DL) was determined. To do this, the mean and standard deviation (SD) for the concentration of sialic acid of 13 replicates of zero standard (distilled water) were calculated; DL was determined as 3 SDs plus the mean value for the zero control samples.e

Serum TSA concentrations from healthy and diseased animals described above were determined and compared. For clinical validation, all results were evaluated for normality of distribution by using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and variance homogeneity was tested by a Levene test. When it was determined that the data did not follow a normal distribution (P < 0.001) and that there was no variance homogeneity (P < 0.001), then results were analyzed by the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test, and differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. All statistical computations were carried out by means of statistical software programs.f,g

Mean values, SDs, and precision results obtained in the analytical study are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The intra- and interassay CVs were lower than 6% and were similar to those reported in humans4,6 and dogs.16 The imprecision of this assay is lower than that of assays commercially available for the determination of other acute-phase markers in pigs, such as pig major acute protein, serum amyloid A, and C reactive protein, which ranged between 6.7% and 37.5% for the intra-assay CVs and between 9.5% and 39.4% for the interassay CVs.14 The main reason for these differences is that most of the assays used to determine APPs in pigs are manual enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays that involve manual sample dilution, which can be a source of imprecision.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) of determinations of total sialic acid (TSA) in porcine serum samples with low (1, 2, and 3) and high (4, 5, and 6) TSA content, and intra-assay CVs mean.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3 Interassay coefficients of variation (CV) of determinations of total sialic acid (TSA) in porcine serum samples with low (1, 2, and 3) and high (4, 5, and 6) TSA content, and interassay CVs mean.

 
As can be seen in Figure 1, the analysis of serial dilutions of a known amount of TSA serum samples to check the linearity under dilution of the assay resulted in linear regression equations with correlation coefficients higher than 0.99, which means that the accuracy of the automated method is acceptable. The analytical DL of the method was 6.07 mg/l, slightly lower than the previously reported ones in humans (12 mg/l6 and 18.55 mg/l4). This discrepancy could be attributable to differences in the methodology and in the DL calculation. Furthermore, the DL is far below the lowest TSA concentrations found in healthy pigs (466.73 mg/l), which demonstrates that the assay is adequate to determine any TSA concentration in porcine serum samples.


Figure 01
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1 Linearity under dilution of porcine serum samples with known concentrations of total sialic acid.

 
Diseased animals showed significantly higher concentrations of serum TSA (median: 1,779.16 mg/l) than healthy animals (median: 692.78 mg/l; P < 0.001), which indicates that serum TSA is likely to be an acute-phase marker in swine (Fig. 2). In healthy animals, 25th and 75th percentiles were 593.92 and 864.28 mg/l, respectively, whereas 5th and 95th percentiles were 556.62 and 963.06 mg/l, respectively. In diseased animals, 25th and 75th percentiles were 1,532.66 and 2,162.38 mg/l, respectively, whereas 5th and 95th percentiles were 1,278.74 and 2,536.12 mg/l, respectively. When TSA values of these 2 groups were compared, it was found that diseased animals presented 2.5-fold higher serum TSA concentrations than healthy animals. Based on previous classifications of acute-phase markers,5 TSA could be considered as a moderate acute-phase marker in pigs. Although future studies with larger sample populations would be needed to determine reference intervals and to assess the clinical value of TSA, results of the current study show that TSA is able to detect inflammatory conditions in pigs, by having a potential use as a moderate acute-phase marker to assess health and welfare status in pig production.


Figure 02
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2 Total sialic acid (TSA) concentrations in serum of healthy (n = 14) and diseased (n = 25) pigs. The plots show the median (line within box), 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5th and 95th percentiles (bars).

 


   Sources and manufacturers
TOP
 Abstract
 Sources and manufacturers
References
 
From the Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. Back

a. Anitec AB, Malmö, Sweden. Back

b. Vacutainer®, BD SA, Madrid, Spain. Back

c. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany. Back

d. Cobas Mira® Plus Analyzer, Horiba ABX, Montpellier, France. Back

e. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Compendium of Chemical Terminology (http://goldbook.iupac.org/L03540.html). Back

f. Microsoft® Excel, Microsoft Corp., Silicon Valley, CA. Back

g. SPSS software, version 11.5, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL. Back


   References
TOP
 Abstract
 Sources and manufacturers
 References
 

  1. Browning L.M., Krebs J.D., Jebb S.A. 2004 Discrimination ratio analysis of inflammatory markers: implications for the study of inflammation in chronic disease. Metabolism 53 899 903.[Medline]
  2. Chavan M., Kawle P.D., Mehta N.G. 2005 Increased sialylation and defucosylation of plasma proteins are early events in the acute phase response. Glycobiology 15 838 848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Citil M., Gunes V., Karapehlivan M., et al. 2004 Evaluation of serum sialic acid as an inflammation marker in cattle with traumatic reticulo peritonitis. Rev Med Vet (Toulouse) 155 389 392.
  4. Crook M. 1993 The determination of plasma or serum sialic acid. Clin Biochem 26 31 38.[Medline]
  5. Eckersall P.D. 2000 Recent advances and future prospects for the use of acute phase proteins as markers of disease in animals. Rev Med Vet (Toulouse) 151 577 584.
  6. Gressner A.M., Henn K.H. 1985 Evaluation of a fully mechanized enzymatic kinetic determination of sialic acid. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 23 781 785.[Medline]
  7. Jensen A.L. 2000 Validation of diagnostic tests in haematology laboratories. In: Feldman V., Zinkl J.G., Jain N.C. Schalm's veterinary haematology 5th ed. 20 28 Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
  8. Kloppel T.M., Richardson R.C., Traver D.S., et al. 1981 Serum lipid-associated sialic acid values in horses wit neoplasms. Am J Vet Res 42 1829 1830.[Medline]
  9. Lauritzen B., Lykkesfeldt J., Skaanild M.T., et al. 2003 Putative biomarkers for evaluating antibiotic treatment: an experimental model of porcine Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infection. Res Vet Sci 74 261 270.[Medline]
  10. Petersen H., Ersboll A.K., Jensen A., et al. 2002 Serum-haptoglobin concentration in slaughter pigs of different health status. Prev Vet Med 54 325 335.[Medline]
  11. Petersen H.H., Nielsen J.P., Heegaard P.M. 2004 Application of acute phase protein measurements in veterinary clinical chemistry. Vet Res 35 163 187.[Medline]
  12. Poli A., Arispici M., Camillo F., et al. 1986 Increase of serum lipid-associates sialic acid concentration in dogs with neoplasms. Am J Vet Res 47 607 609.[Medline]
  13. Sillanaukee P., Pöniö M., Jääskeläinen I.P. 1999 Occurrence of sialic acids in healthy humans and different disorders. Eur J Clin Invest 29 413 425.[Medline]
  14. Tecles F., Fuentes P., Martinez Subiela S., et al. 2007 Analytical validation of commercially available methods for acute phase proteins quantification in pigs. Res Vet Sci 83 133 139.[Medline]
  15. Thougaard A.V., Hellmén E., Jensen A.L. 1998 Total serum sialic acid is a general disease marker rather than a specific tumour marker in dogs. J Vet Med 45 471 479.
  16. Thougaard A.V., Jensen A.L., Wenck A. 1994 Evaluation of an automated spectrophotometric assay for the determination of total sialic acid in canine serum. Vet Res Commun 18 337 345.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cerón, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soler, L.
Right arrow Articles by Cerón, J. J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS